|
Acme 5001 White Supreme Juicerator Juice Extractor | 
 enlarge | Brand: ACME
List Price: $255.00
Buy Used: $69.95
You Save: $185.05 (73%)
Rating:  5 reviews
Shipping Weight (lbs): 12.7
MPN: 5001
UPC: 040072940026
EAN: 0040072940026
ASIN: B0000DDVUO
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
| • | Model No.: 5001 | | • | Dimensions: 8.5 x 11-in. | | • | Weight: 12.5-lbs. | | • | Volts/Watts: 4.8 Amps/ 550-watts | | • | Origin: USA |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
From Waring, this Supreme Juicerator converts fruits and vegetables into pulp-free juice for refreshing and healthy beverages any time of the day. The machine is equipped with a powerful 550-watt motor and is vibration free for quiet operation in your kitchen. The blade and internal mechanisms are made of commercial quality stainless steel, with a polycarbonate outer surface that easily disassembles for cleaning in the dishwasher. Included with your juicer - a bowl, cover and instruction booklet. Five-year limited warranty on the motor.
|
| Customer Reviews:
 solid build, not hassle free March 28, 2008
Joseph L. Kolb (harris, mn USA)
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
i've had my acme 5001 for years. i agree it is well-built and sturdy. my main complaint is the filter sheets. you have to use these filter sheets (which are bleached) on it. once they start getting covered with pulp, you get less juice out of the machine. so, if you are doing a lot of juicing at once, you'll have to change filters, or, it will be like a King of Queens comedy episode were Doug goes through a bag of fruit for a couple drops of juice. (i have been told you can juice without the sheets.) cleaning it is a hassle too. i do own the citris attachment. it works great, though big and bulky. also very hard to clean. i would look into better designed juicers as there are plenty to choose from.
 Bought mine in 1977 February 20, 2007
Sally (Arizona)
5 out of 6 found this review helpful
That would be 30 years of serious juicing, and it's still going strong. It powers through about anything you stuff in it, and it's heavy and stays where you put it. Yes, it's a bit noisy-- it sounds something like a miniature tree chipper (fine as long as it works like one) but it's not as loud as our KitchenAid stand mixer. It makes great juice.
Does a great job with the citrus too. I have never regretted my purchase.
 Great tasting juice January 12, 2007
H. Lawson
3 out of 4 found this review helpful
I love fresh juice. It is so good. This machine has no trouble juicing hard fruits and vegetables. It does get off balance when trying to juice softer fruits and vegetables. I wish it was easier to clean. I tried the juice filters, and they cause the juicer to become off balance a lot easier. But I have to say, fresh juice is so much better than you buy in the grocery store. And I love the fact I can control my ingredients. I would highly recommend juicing.
Acme set the standard for juicers June 10, 2005
Joseph W. Keyes (Califon, New Jersey USA)
23 out of 24 found this review helpful
Acme was the standard for juicers when we purchased ours 15 years ago. It still does everything -- soft, hard, and green leafy vegetables, fruits, and root vegetables. The pulp from carrot and celery make the base for a great "un-chicken" salad.
The citrus attachment is a worthwhile accesssory for orange and grapefruit juices. It is rock-solid and has never needed any part repaired or replaced.
On the down side, it is heavy, bulky, a bit noisy. The newer juicers appear more ergonomic and boast more features, but I'm not sure if they can lay claim to the durablility of the Acme.
Strong, dependable, great value. September 28, 2004
S. Hunter (Maryland, USA)
29 out of 32 found this review helpful
I bought an Acme Juicerator in 1978, use it several times a week and it is still going strong! It works great, it's easy to use, and to clean. I highly recommend it. The strong motor and stainless steel disc blades powers through whatever I put in it, and the fresh juice is fabulous.
|
|
|
|
| |
