|
Under Armour Boxerjock | 
 enlarge
| Brand: Under Armour
Department: Mens
Buy New: $19.75 - $20.00
HisRoom  582 reviews
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
HerRoom 2543 reviews
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Fogdog 21195 reviews
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Rating:  26 reviews
Fabric Type: Polyester
Color: Black
Memorabilia: No
Clothing Size: Large
Shipping Weight (lbs): 2
Dimensions (in): 8 x 6 x 2
UPC: 698611762594
EAN: 0698611762839
ASIN: B000GCJ7VA
Promotion: Get free shipping on this item when you spend $40.00 or more on Qualifying Items offered by HisRoom. Terms and Conditions
| |
| Features:
| • | Boxer jock, Breathable and ventilated performance pouch, Heatgear: For extremeley warm weather | | • | Lightweight compression fit, 95% PolyArmour and 5% Elastane | | • | 3 inch inseam | | • | All day performance | | • | Heatgear construction wicks moisture away |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Under Armour Boxerjock. This Under Armour short Boxer is cut for a comfortable fit with full leg coverage offering a lightweight compression fit. The breathable vent mesh performance pouch gives you support without sacrificing comfort. HeatGear fabric guarantees you're cool, dry and comfortable. 5 3/4" inseam. State Color and Size. Order Now! Under Armour Boxerjock
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 5 more reviews...
Best Underwear for working out, but pricey September 30, 2008
D (Metro Detroit, MI USA)
I usually run 4-5 days a week, and take a spinning class 2-3 days a week. I used to wear Champion cotton boxer briefs while working out. But cotton boxer briefs have two drawbacks: 1) they don't compress your muscles, which is actually helpful in preventing pulls and strains; and 2) they get wet with sweat, and can lead to chafing and irritation.
The UnderArmour boxerjock solves both of those problems. They are truly the most comfortable wicking fabric I've ever worn, and they, even if merely psychologically, make my workouts seem more effective.
Yes, they are pricey. No getting around that. But in my opinion, they are truly worth the price.
Best Underwear ever! September 27, 2008
Sarah Wilson (Colorado)
I bought these for my husband. We are usually cheap skates but these underwear are worth the money to him. They are the only underwear that keeps him dry. The only thing I would take notice of before purchasing would be the inseam. We ordered the shorter pair, not realizing how short they are. They still do the same job, but hubby would have prefered the longer in seam.
 Careful - This item is the "short" boxerjock September 18, 2008
D. Rose
This item is actually the "SHORT" boxer (with 3 inch inseam). I know because I ordered it based on the description which says it has the 5 3/4 inseam, but it does not. Apparently it is Amazon's fault in listing it wrong, not the seller's (Worldwide Sport Supply, who was nice and helpful and provided a refund) but just take care when ordering that you are getting the style you want.
Good Buy August 13, 2008
K. Paugh (San Jose, CA USA)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
These boxer jocks are great. To me, they're more comfortable than cotton jocks, especially when you're active all day, or working out. I always were them when I go on vacation, because I'm usually walking a lot.
 Great for summer & workouts July 17, 2008
Philly
I work out at the gym 4-5 days a week, and need a brief type short for "support". I used 2xist briefs (which cost about the same) and they did a good job, but now that switched to these - WOW. Much more supportive and the material is much more skin-tight and slimmer material than the 2xist cotton briefs.
The walk to work today and the walk home yesterday is in jeans with these boxers, and these briefs just wick the sweat away.
They are expensive, which is why I only give 4 stars. If these were $10 a pop, I'd easily give them 5 stars. Totally worth buying if you are like me, you go to the gym after work and need a supportive brief &/or need a brief for outside in hot weather. Not sure how they will be in winter, due to the thin (but definitely not cheap) material.
| |
|
|
| |
